Invite Friends

Topic: Supreme Court

Kavanaugh accuser set to testify about sexual assault-believe her or political?

  • Comments: 198 |
  • Votes: 42
  • Share
Picture?type=square
Discussion started by Tok Staff:
Christine Blasey Ford set to testify Thursday to Judiciary Committee about assault Kavanaugh denies. Believe her or political hack job?
Background article: ... Read more
Results in this view: Y-disqualify Him 57% - Y-doesn't Matter 0% - He Said/she Said 13% - N-lies/political 30%
Picture?type=square
  • 3
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 18
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
By Rudy Schulz Classic She said / He said - No evidence no case. The vote should move forward. Testimony by the alleged victim w/o corroborating evidence is meaningless. whether you believe her or not is immaterial. Of course the leftists of the USA can't have a SCOTUS Justice who believes in supporting the US Constitution and the rule of law. That just doesn't support their agenda. Funny how Feinstein held on to this accusation for 6 weeks and all of the sudden this all comes out at the eleventh hour. It most certainly is political and in typical Leftist fashion.
Picture?type=square
  • 4
Picture?type=square
  • 4
Picture?type=square
  • 22
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 28
Picture?type=square
  • 24
Picture?type=square
  • 9
Picture?type=square
  • 3
Anonymous-user
  • 18
Picture?type=square
  • 10
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
  • 2
Anonymous-user
Picture?type=square
By Kevis Basnair Shut up LIAR!
Picture?type=square
By Rudy Schulz My, my, aren't you getting just a little too upset? If you could take the time and point out the errors in my statement, then maybe we could have an adult discussion. Merely telling me to shut up and calling me a liar isn't the way adults debate issues.
Picture?type=square
By Kevin Basner EFFEN LIAR! You are not a liberal!
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman could you at least try to make a cogent argument instead of having a hysterical fit? keep calm what did i tell you
dot hate your enemies it effects your judgement and your ability to combat them
seriously chill too much prozac or not enough?
oh wait that reminds me time for my prozax
Picture?type=square
By Rudy Schulz Heavens no. I'm certainly not a liberal. Actually, I find most liberals to be abhorrent creatures devoid of common sense who routinely come unglued and spew incoherent rhetoric when faced with inconvenient truths.
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman there should be a hearing in a trial testimony is based on the credibility of witnesses i notice he wont take a lie detector test ford did what does that indicate, it inidcates he has a lot to hide, stuff is coming out about his conduct as a teen, he was no virgin no saint he was a drunken pig he did this sort of thing repeatedly and you want to cover that up, nice try
Picture?type=square
By Rudy Schulz "he did this sort of thing repeatedly." If you have anything other than hearsay evidence, please share. I'm fine with a hearing if there is anything out there that is of value. Personally, I feel this whole bucket of slime is nothing more than a delaying tactic of the left. Their delaying and obstruction started a few seconds after the hearings began. This is only a continuation of it. By the way, having taken more than one polygraph test, I can assure you that they aren't the most accurate devices in the world. That's why they are inadmissible as evidence at trial.
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman i want to see evidence and i will surprise you if this is bogus, i think there should be ramifications, if the democrats are playing games lieing etc, all invovled should be punished i'm losing patience with everyone both sides seems to be angry if you wont accept their world without corroboration, i trust neither side to be honest i want the truth i can handle the truth
Picture?type=square
By Rudy Schulz Truth would be nice. That's why I would like corroboration. Everyone in DC lies so you can't tell fact from fiction w/o corroboration.
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman truth would be nice i agree which is why i am so puzzled about the resistance to an fbi investigation
Anonymous-user
by anon-8b18 They don't have any jurisdiction over a case that happened in MD 35 years ago. There was never nor has there been a complaint filed. There is no case and really, there is nothing for them to investigate at the federal level.
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman sure they do you know thats a lie
Picture?type=square
By Rudy Schulz Typical response I expected. /you don't know what you're talking about so you call a post a lie. There is no federal jurisdiction in this 35 year old event. It i8s a local matter. The State of MD could intervene if Gov. Hogan directs. FBI could be called in at the request of the state, but that hasn't happened. Sorry, there is a jurisdiction issue here and the FBI has no grounds to investigate.
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman if nothing else i am predictable .. or am i?
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman sure there is
Picture?type=square
By Rudy Schulz Hoe so, although it is OBE now.
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman a storm is coming