Invite Friends

Topic: Supreme Court

Results in this view: Y-more Balance 69% - Convince Me 0% - N-fine As Is 8% - N-other Changes 23%
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 2
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris No, nine is enough. We need to term limit them.
Picture?type=square
  • 24
Picture?type=square
  • 7
Picture?type=square
Anonymous-user
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman you are such an elitist
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman dont be coy it isnt cute anymore
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Not coy. I want proof.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman i dont care what you want i want free ice cream and cheap vodka i want a sex driod that will scream my name during orgasm .. what you want isnt important
the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris You make a claim, then you must prove it or we can all dismiss it as bullshatee.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman do as you wish i dont care what you do i have my say and mov on you never prove what you say smarty
never not once
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris dismissed by all readers. You cant prove it.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman lol dear readers https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whistleblower-case-trump-admits-he-discussed-joe-biden-in-call-with-ukrainian-president/
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris That isn't proof. In the article's quote, Trump said he talked about Ukraine corruption and the part Biden and Hunter played. He never said he wanted dirt dug up on his opponent, the sin of the magazine says that is what he admitted.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman if isay its proof then it is
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Not how it works dingbat
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman they need to be directly elected by the people if the majority wants conservtives judges they can elect them themselves let the people actually rule
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris no, mob rule is bad. We need no more than nine, term limited. Electing them would turn it into more of a circus than it already is now. And end judicial review like Hamilton said should never be.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Fluck the oligarchy. I don't want majority mob rule or minority mob rule. Both dangerous. We need the picking of the Court to be a bigger circus, with campaign ads and lying and that stuff.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman i'm not talking bout a mob i'm talking abut your neighbors, your family, people that work in factories and offices the people that role up their sleeves and make this nation work if they are not to decide who will? you will submit to the will of the people, you can call that tyrrany i dont care, i am more than wiling to die and kill to end this oligarchy, if the stret must be flooded with g blood if the cities must burn? so be it.. welcome to the revolution kirby
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Why the Founders set it up this way. They need terms limits though, and to stop judicial review.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman the founders be damend they are dead and i'm glad of it i'm an immigrant why do i car what a bunch of slave owning anglos wanted my tribe had different traditions and we came here to conquer https://historynewsnetwork.org/blog/3572 my ancestors came over with a different tradition we wont comply to your values this isnt your nation any more
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Dumbazz, you are the one talking constitutional issues, so they matter azzhat.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman change or ignore the constittuion as far back as teddy roosevelt who i admire people had decided the contittution had no real bearing on the modern world, as tr said the constitution is to serve the people not the people serve the constitution the constittution is out moded i'd have my supreem court justices re interprete it or i'djust ignore it, t i had to? id simply declare martial law indefinetely and make it irrelevant its a piace of paper it means notjing to me
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman the constittuion is nothng but a piace of paper
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Wrong, the Constitution is not just a piece of paper. It is the framework for what the Federal government can and can't do to stop a dictatorship and allow the people to be free.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris There are those on the right and left who ignored it to do what they thought right or for power. Teddy was right. The Constitution is to serve the people not the people serve the Constitution, that is WHY the Feds can't violate it at their whim.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris And wrong, Teddy respected the Constitution, didn't considered it outdated. That is why he said the Constitution is to serve the people not the people serve the Constitution, and he thought he was following it, rather he was or not.
Reply
  • | about 1M ago