Invite Friends

Topic: Afghan War

Billions in rare minerals tempt US to stay in Afghanistan. Good reason?

  • Comments: 76 |
  • Votes: 33
  • Share
Picture?type=square
Discussion started by Tok Staff:
Afghanistan has huge deposits of rare and valuable minerals, one reason the US thinks twice about leaving. Is that a good reason to stay?
Background article: ... Read more
Results in this view: Y-important 18% - Convince Me 24% - N-not A Factor 59%
Anonymous-user
  • 2
Picture?type=square
  • 3
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
  • 11
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 12
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
By Kevin Basner Rare minerals are worth a fortune and I would think anyone fighting over there that voted for Trump would want the money that would usually result!
Picture?type=square
  • 3
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 2
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
  • 22
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey You fail to recognize the prosperity it could bring to tha Afghan population, similar to what oil brought to much of the Arabian peninsula. Prosperity overcomes much of the desire to fight continuing wars.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Michael Neil Assuming it would go to ordinary Afghanis...which is unlikely.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey Why is that unlikely? If the plan was properly developed, executed and overseen it could be very successful. Even making an attempt that failed would be better then not even trying to improve the situation.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris You both miss the point. it is not our minerals, and we should not continue to occupy another nation for their minerals.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Michael Neil Only because it never has before. Iraqi oil profits, when they stay in country, which is rare in this age of transnational corporations, go to the Iraqi elite. The same will be true here. Of course, it's THEORETICALLY possible to make your scenario work, but I can't think of very many instances of it happening.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey You assume because things have always be the way discribed that they will always be that way, has no one else the ablitiy to imagine and plan for a differnt outcome?
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey All change begins with a theory.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Not our minerals. What are we an empire? Take and do what we want?
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey You assume that we go and take. Tha Afgahns would have to agree to the process. It would be their minerals to sell, some to the nations who helped capitalize the operation and offer protection to the project, as payment, the balance to whom ever wished to purchase these materials.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Like they would say no to the US. They would fear we would make them the new Taliban and go to war with them.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey Speculation on both our parts.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago
Picture?type=square
By Kirby Liberty Harris Well, I think it has come out over time that that is what US regimes do.
Reply
  • | about 1y ago