- Location: London, United Kingdom
- Joined: August 2012
At this stage, any improvements in the economy will be largely down to the previous administration. You don't gain significant economic traction in less than a year. Especially as company business plans tend to have lead in times measured in years, not weeks. He's quick to blame the previous administration for anything he believes his gullible base will swallow. Yet he's also quick to claim, hypocritically, their successes as his own.
At this stage, any improvement in the economy will be largely down to the previous administration. You can't make much of an economic impact in less than a year. Especially as company business plans tend to have a lead in time of between 1 and 5 years. Trump is quick to blame the previous administration for anything he thinks his supporters will believe. Yet is also quick to claim credit, hypocritically, for their successes...
I would have said 'other' but didn't want to be lumped in with the 'moral majority'. In fact combining 'other' with 'morality' skews the question, hugely. Deliberate?
If it is true, we don't yet know the reasons. Though I should imagine constantly having Trump's face shoved in theirs is somewhat off-putting... ;)
Did you bother to read the article? You definitely haven't made any coherent argument against their point of view...
"WRONG AND WRONG"? For making a legitimate and valid point? They acknowledge that there was a need for abuse to come out into the open and they condemn all instances of rape, sexual assault and genuine harassment. Their point is that it has turned into a witchunt. A trial by Twitter. Where people are being condemned as guilty, purely by being named and having their and thei family's lives destroyed. Some will be innocent, whilst others are 'guilty' of little more than incompetent flirting, yet all are being lumped in along with the serious offenders. This is not jusice, is creating an ugly climate and will undermine both legitimate grievances and the movement itself.
Perhaps you should read the article, before commenting, next time? Though your uninformed, kneejerk response emphasises their point for them