Topic: US Politics

Supreme Court to decide on Trump's tax returns: release them to investigators?

  • Comments: 48 |
  • Votes: 9
  • Share
Picture?type=square
Discussion started by Tok Staff:
House panels, state AGs and most of the public want to see them, but Trump and his Justice Dept. are in the Supreme Court trying to block it. Your view?
Background article: ... Read more
Results in this view: Y-can't Refuse 78% - Convince Me 22% - N-potus Immune 0%
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
  • 4
Picture?type=square
  • 3
Anonymous-user
  • 8
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey The release of tax records is for political purpose, it the government can release Trumps tax returns, individual tax returns are the next target. The court will decide the legal aspects relating to rights to privacy.
Picture?type=square
  • 11
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 12
Picture?type=square
By Vincent D'Emidio Trump, with his big, stupid mouth, doesn't deserve any privacy!
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey You miss the point, if he, Trump, loses the right to privacy we all do.
Picture?type=square
By Vincent D'Emidio Well, if PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, a real President, had to show his birth certificate and have his privacy violated, then Trump...the WORST POS that ever occupied the Oval Office...should have his privacy violated as well.
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey The Obama birth certificate was released voluntarily by the White House, not forced by law or court ruling.
The birth certificate controversy also revolved around Obamas legal eligibility to even be President.
Picture?type=square
By Vincent D'Emidio ...and since the BIRTH CERTIFICATE was proven to be 100% ACCURATE, then "president" Chump should've shut his big, STUPID mouth! He didn't even start the rumour, he just repeated it like the PARROT that he is.

That ridiculous rumour was started by an Israeli "settler" named Orly Taitz, who, as a LAND-GRABBING, ahem, "settler" (if you wanna call them that), was opposed to President Barack Obama because, as a TRUE Partisan of Peace, he would've pressured that LOWLIFE, Binyamin "There will never be a Palestinian State" Netanyahu to THROW OUT all of those ILLEGAL "settlements", unlike "president" Chump who GIVES Binyamin everything that he, and his "settler" butt-buddies, wanted!
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey You are far off topic.
Picture?type=square
By Vincent D'Emidio Perhaps, but what I said is 100% correct.
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey It may be true, but many disagree with the need for Palestinian state and about the right to settle the occupied territory.
Picture?type=square
By Vincent D'Emidio The only ones to disagree are the land-grabbing, ahem, "settlers" (if you could call them that), Likud Party FILTH, Trump-loving republicans, evangelical know-nothings and racist POS's. Most of the world DOES believe in Palestinian Rights, so, quire frankly, I don't give a damn what the RACISTS of this country think.

Most people believe that the West Bank is Palestinian land and that Israeli "settlements" DON'T belong there.
Picture?type=square
By Bill Sands all tax returns should be on public record if you dont pay your taxes you should lose your rights and be treated the same way a violent felon is treated
Picture?type=square
By Mark Tracey If that is wanted By a broad range of citizens, then the Congress could pass a law and if found unconstitutional, amend the constitution. Our wise we follow the law we have.
Tax dodgers and felons commit very different forms of crimes which are not equivalent. You Are falling prey to a one size fits all model of centralize power.